University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Tennis Financial Data

NCAA Membership Financial Reporting System (MFRS) · Big Ten · Data available: FY2010–FY2025

In fiscal year 2025, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)'s Tennis program reported $1.1M in revenue and $3.0M in expenses, for a net deficit of $1.9M. The program generated $1.1M in total revenue, led by Sports Camp Revenues at $685K. Among the 73 FBS programs reporting Tennis data, University of California, Los Angeles ranks 11th overall in total expenses (11th of 42 Power Four programs) — above the FBS average of $1.8M. University of California, Los Angeles competes in the Big Ten; financial data is available from FY2010 through FY2025.

FY2025 Overview

Total Revenue
$1,138,233
Total Expenses
$3,043,206
Net
-$1,904,973

This is a data snapshot. The interactive explorer lets you filter by sport, compare schools, and dig into multi-year trends.

Open Interactive Explorer →

FY2025 Revenue Sources

CategoryAmount
Sports Camp Revenues$684,652
Contributions$185,387
Athletics Restricted Endowment and Investments Income$173,714
NCAA Distributions$94,480

FY2025 Expense Breakdown

CategoryAmount
Coaching Salaries, Benefits and Bonuses paid by the University and Related Entities$1,068,606
Athletic Student Aid$734,575
Team Travel$334,834
Sports Camp Expenses$327,695
Sports Equipment, Uniforms and Supplies$129,897
Game Expenses$108,221
NCAA Post-Season Non-Football Expenses$106,050
Enhanced Educational Benefits (Alston or other)$92,441
Other Operating Expenses$74,760
Recruiting$38,970
Support Staff/Administrative Compensation, Benefits and Bonuses paid by the University and Related Entities$12,435
NCAA Post-Season Non-Football Expenses - Coaching Compensation/Bonuses$10,000
NCAA Non-Football Host Expense Settlements$3,611
Fund Raising, Marketing and Promotion$839
Facilities Maintenance and Operations$272
Data sourced from NCAA MFRS filings obtained via public records (FOIA) requests and official athletic department disclosures. Figures are as reported to the NCAA and may include institutional support, conference distributions, and other non-self-generated revenue. See the methodology page for full sourcing details.

Year-over-Year Trend

Fiscal YearRevenueExpensesNet
FY2025$1,138,233$3,043,206-$1.9M
FY2024$891,326$2,994,611-$2.1M
FY2023$859,428$2,849,653-$2.0M
FY2022$358,362$2,249,396-$1.9M
FY2021$328,672$1,980,591-$1.7M
FY2020$1,186,325$2,530,517-$1.3M

University of California, Los Angeles Tennis — Financial Context

UCLA's tennis program generated $1.1 million in revenue in FY2025, with sports camp revenues accounting for a commanding $685K of that total, though expenses of $3.0 million resulted in a $1.9 million deficit. Coaching salaries, benefits, and bonuses represented the program's largest cost at $1.1 million, helping push total spending to nearly double the FBS average of $1.8 million and ranking UCLA 11th among all 73 FBS programs in tennis expenditures. Program expenses have grown significantly over the past five years, rising from $2.0 million in FY2021 to $3.0 million in both

Other Sports at University of California, Los Angeles

Football · Men's Basketball · Women's Basketball · Baseball · Soccer · Volleyball · Swimming and Diving · Softball · Golf · Gymnastics · Rowing · Track and Field · Water Polo · Beach Volleyball

Frequently Asked Questions

What does University of California, Los Angeles spend on Tennis?
University of California, Los Angeles Tennis reported $3,043,206 in total expenses in FY2025. The largest expense was Coaching Salaries, Benefits and Bonuses paid by the University and Related Entities at $1,068,606.
How does University of California, Los Angeles Tennis spending compare to other FBS programs?
Among the 73 FBS programs reporting Tennis data, University of California, Los Angeles ranks 11th overall in total expenses (11th of 42 Power Four programs) — above the FBS average of $1.8M.
How is University of California, Los Angeles Tennis funded?
Like most Power Four Tennis programs, University of California, Los Angeles funds Tennis primarily through shared athletic department revenues, which flow from football and basketball at most FBS institutions.